| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
| Contests / 2003 / Global Subway Photo Contest | ©2005-2013 ~xtuv |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
(are you still around on dA - what ya up to?)
and my question, you say this is a defished fisheye...i know what this means, you did things with stretching out certain parts of the image to make it so the barrelling wasn't apparent(i think it's called barreling)...i'm just wondering, after doing this, is the shot really alot wider than a normal lens? like after doing the editing to defish it...is there still a noticeable amount more in the picture than if you were to just take the picture without the lens?
sorry if this bugs you that i'm asking...just a curious george i suppose
But keep in mind this is shot on a digibody with 1.6x cropfactor.
It looks symmetric too... Cool!
Nikon Capture won't work with my Canon RAW files I guess
Anyway, with PTlens it's just a mouseclick and you're done!
The image quality doens't really get bad. On resized pic's there's nothing visible from it anyway, Maybe it starts to be visible on large prints, which I hardly make..
Actually the corners don't really get stretched, here's an example of a defished canon 15mm fisheye pic: [link]
On my 16mm it's a bit less then that.
So you loose a bit of the corner information, but still it's great wideangle